Skip to content

Domain F: Sustainability

Focus: Financial sustainability and economic contribution

Indicators: 6 (2 Core, 4 Enhancement)

The business question

Can we pay the bills? Moves us from short-term grant dependency to sustainable cost recovery.

Most health data services in the UK operate on short-term grant funding, creating a cycle of uncertainty that undermines staffing, infrastructure investment, and strategic planning. This domain assesses whether an organisation has moved beyond grant dependency toward sustainable cost recovery, commercial partnerships, and demonstrable economic impact — the evidence base funders need to commit to long-term investment.


Indicator Summary

ID Indicator Type Class Unit
F.1.1 Funding Horizon Core B0 Both
F.1.2 Financial Risk Management Enhancement O Both
F.2.1 Cost Recovery & Pricing Core B0 Both
F.2.2 Commercial Revenue & Partnerships Enhancement O Both
F.3.1 Economic Impact Assessment Enhancement Y Both
F.3.2 Value Demonstration Enhancement Y Both

F.1 — Funding Security

F.1.1 Funding Horizon

CORE · B0 · Both

Level Description
L1 Precarious. Short-term grants. Gap within 12 months.
L2 Secured 1-2 years. Not baselined. Grant-dependent.
L3 Core secured 2-3 years. Mixed baseline/grant. Medium-term concerns.
L4 Core >= 3 years. Baseline covers essentials. Grants supplement not sustain.
L5 Long-term >= 5 years. Diverse sources. Reserves. Enables innovation.

F.1.2 Financial Risk Management

ENHANCEMENT · O · Both

Level Description
L1 No management. Single funder. No contingency.
L2 Risks identified. Mitigation discussed. Limited diversification.
L3 Basic with risks/mitigations. Some diversification. Minor contingency.
L4 Active with register, plans, review. >= 3 sources. 3+ months reserves.
L5 Comprehensive resilience. Scenario planning. Counter-cyclical. Enables opportunistic investment.

F.2 — Commercial Models

F.2.1 Cost Recovery & Pricing

CORE · B0 · Both

Level Description
L1 No recovery. Services free/subsidised. True cost unknown.
L2 Analysis initiated. Unit costs calculated. Principles discussed.
L3 Model with pricing for some services. Partial recovery. Basic IP terms.
L4 Comprehensive with rate card. Tiered. >= 50% recovery. IP aligned with Fair Value principles.
L5 Transparent, sustainable pricing model (published rate card, justified subsidies, predictable invoicing). Fair Value aligned.

F.2.2 Commercial Revenue & Partnerships

ENHANCEMENT · O · Both

Level Description
L1 No commercial revenue. No partnership framework.
L2 Opportunities identified. Pilots initiated. Principles developing.
L3 Some revenue (<10%). Offering exists. Basic agreements.
L4 Significant (10-30%). Active pipeline. Competitive. LSSD2 aligned. IP defined.
L5 Substantial (>30%). Major partnerships. Sophisticated models. Good practice.

F.3 — Impact Evidence

F.3.1 Economic Impact Assessment

ENHANCEMENT · Y (Outcome) · Both

Outcome indicator

This is an Outcome/Context indicator — reported for situational awareness but excluded from readiness scoring.

Level Description
L1 No assessment. Contribution not quantified.
L2 Commissioned/planned. Methodology developing.
L3 Initial completed. Headlines available. May be limited.
L4 Proportionate assessment within 3 years. Methodology documented. Findings published.
L5 Regular. Validated. Trajectory tracked. Influences policy. Contributing nationally.

F.3.2 Value Demonstration

ENHANCEMENT · Y (Outcome) · Both

Outcome indicator

This is an Outcome/Context indicator — reported for situational awareness but excluded from readiness scoring.

Level Description
L1 No systematic demonstration. Benefits claimed not evidenced.
L2 Proposition articulated. Case studies developing. Metrics defined.
L3 Portfolio of case studies. Metrics tracked. Communicated.
L4 Comprehensive framework with multiple dimensions. Regular reporting. Supports funding case.
L5 Sophisticated with attribution. ROI quantified. Influences policy. Framework shared.